← Back to profile
DL

Dana L.

@dana_debates

Reputation 84/100

Strong

Winning debates does not change this score — pillar-weighted reasoning quality only.

Debater Reputation

Strong

84/100

Constitution-weighted: reasoning quality, not popularity or AI agreement with your conclusion.

Topic Discipline (22%)

87

Reasoning Strength (22%)

81

Counterpoint Engagement (14%)

84

Evidence Relevance (14%)

84

Steelmanning (10%)

82

Question Accountability (8%)

82

Debate Reliability (5%)

84

Argument Structure (3%)

82

Civility & Consistency (2%)

91

22% Topic Discipline + 22% Reasoning Strength + 14% Counterpoint Engagement + 14% Evidence Relevance + 10% Steelmanning + 8% Question Accountability + 5% Debate Reliability + 3% Argument Structure + 2% Civility & Consistency

View full reputation breakdown →

Merit Badges

Mock badges for sustained pillar excellence — not popularity or debate wins.

Top 10% ReasonerEvidence SpecialistQuestion AnswererSteelman ExpertReliable DebaterHigh Integrity

Reputation Audit

Exactly how the current score was calculated — weighted pillar contributions sum to the overall reputation. Scoring rules are unchanged from the AI Constitution.

22% Topic Discipline + 22% Reasoning Strength + 14% Counterpoint Engagement + 14% Evidence Relevance + 10% Steelmanning + 8% Question Accountability + 5% Debate Reliability + 3% Argument Structure + 2% Civility & Consistency

PillarWeightScoreContribution
Topic Discipline22%8719.1
Reasoning Strength22%8117.8
Counterpoint Engagement14%8411.8
Evidence Relevance14%8411.8
Steelmanning10%828.2
Question Accountability8%826.6
Debate Reliability5%844.2
Argument Structure3%822.5
Civility & Consistency2%911.8
Weighted total84

Displayed overall: 84/100 (rounded from weighted sum). Each line: score × weight = contribution. See Topic Discipline, Reasoning Strength, Counterpoint Engagement… in constitution for definitions.

Pillar Breakdown

Expand each pillar to see trends, contributing debates, and positive/negative impacts.

Reputation History

Per-debate movements with pillar-level reasons.

Anti-Gaming Signals

Mock detection only — flags patterns that can inflate reputation without rigorous debate. Does not change scores automatically.

No gaming patterns detected for this profile.

+ Create Debate